Don't Miss Anything We Post. Join Our Email List Today.

The Ten Worst Things Scott Pruitts EPA Has Already Done

No part of the government has been untouched by the Trump revolution. Multiple Cabinet departments are headed by people opposed to their core missions, the judiciary is being transformed at an unprecedented rate, and thanks to the new tax cut, even the sacred cows of Medicare and Social Security are now in line for legislative slaughter.

But nowhere is the takeover clearer than at the Environmental Protection Agency , now headed by Scott Pruitt, who constructed his name suing the watchdog on behalf of fossil-fuel interests. In one year, Pruitt has destroyed the foundations of the agency, firing scientists and replacing them with industry lobbyists; undoing critical regulations that protect our air and water; and favoring industry interests over public health.

The trajectory is clear: Prioritize polluters’ liberty over personal freedom, health, and environmental protection. Here are the top 10 worst actions Pruitt’s EPA has taken in 2017 😛 TAGEND

10. Corruption

Pruitt is probably the most suspect member of the Trump administration, which is saying a lot. At his confirmation, he lied to Congress( a felony) about his private email account, which he used for communicating with industry representatives. When he served as Oklahoma’s attorney general, Pruitt was discovered to have simply cut and pasted a letter written by petroleum giant Devon Energy onto his own stationery.

And then there’s the money. Since taking office, Pruitt racked up $58,000 in taxpayer-paid travel bills for flights to and from Oklahoma( where he is rumored to be mulling a Senate run in 2020 ), often on the flimsiest of pretext. The EPA’s inspector general is investigating.

Pruitt also expended $40,000 of taxpayer money to fly to Morocco to promote fossil fuels.( How that counts as “environmental protection” is anyone’s guess .) And he retained a shady PR firm that has previously done “opposition research” on journalists, at the cost to taxpayers of $120,000 — a contract voided when the news of it violated.

9. Slashing the Budget to “Tidbits”

The EPA is, in large part, a law-enforcement agency. Yet can you imagine any other law-enforcement department slashing its budget by more than 30 percent in one year? The outcome is a deliberate anarchy as polluters know the EPA can’t( and doesn’t want to) do its job. Enforcement actions have dropped by more than 30 percent from Obama administration levels, and more than 20 percent from George W. Bush levels. Demands that polluting factories clean up their act have plummeted nearly 90 percent. The cops are just not walking the beat.

For example, Superfund enforcement–i.e ., building polluters pay for cleaning up the toxic messes they’ve made–has been cut 37 percent, causing many cleanups to simply stop wholly( PDF ). In 2017 alone, programs that have been completely eliminated include those that reduce radon in schools, control runoff pollution from roads, and certify lead-paint-removal contractors, among many others. And that’s by design: Candidate Trump promised to eliminate all of the EPA, leaving only “tidbits.” Pruitt is his hatchet man. But even these budget cuts don’t include the largest shrink of the agency…

8. Hollowing Out the Agency

It’s not just EPA’s budget being cut–it’s the agency itself . More than 700 employees have left or been forced out. That’s just the beginning: Congress is set to appropriate $60 million to buy out the contracts of EPA staff, whose stances will be eliminated. Many high-level enforcement chores remain vacant.

Other key posts have been filled by former industry shills, like Nancy Beck, a chemical-industry lobbyist who’s now ostensibly in charge of regulating toxic chemicals. Whistleblowers have reported a culture of fear and mistrust, with longtime staffers assumed to be disloyal to the new regime.

Elgie Holstein, senior director for strategic planning at Environmental Defense Fund, told The Daily Beast these cuts are motivated not by budgetary concerns but by opposition to the EPA’s core mission.” It’s easy to think of it as reducing bureaucracy ,” Holstein said,” but when you consider the fact that EPA is such a small agency to begin with, with a budget that’s basically what it was in the 1970 s( adjusted for inflation ), it’s pretty clear that further reductions in faculty is all part of a strategy to undermine and hollow out EPA as an effective public health agency .”

7. Disaster Failure

One of the most stark examples of the EPA’s incapacity came after Hurricane Harvey, when the unfolding storm tragedy caused factories to release nearly 6 million pounds of pollution into the air. The EPA was slow to respond, but quick to issue a press release congratulating itself. In one case, a chemical plant exploded, triggering evacuations, and the EPA was found to have simply not shown up at the scene until after the explosion happened.

By coincidence, the EPA had just withdrawn the Chemical Disaster Rule, which would require companies to disclose which hazardous materials they had on site. That withdrawal didn’t affect the Houston response, but it indicated that the next such disaster might be even worse; the EPA is not a disaster-response agency–its value comes from monitoring hazards over the long term, which now it won’t do as efficiently.

This will only get worse. Global climate disruption has already increased the frequency of extreme weather events. If the EPA’s budget is slashed by a third, and if climate change is not allowed to be spoken of, let alone factored into hazard analysis and resource allocation, Harvey is just a tiny taste of what is to come.

6. Secrecy

You wouldn’t know the EPA is a public agency from Pruitt’s unprecedented secrecy. He has demanded that employees not take notes at meetings with him, ordered a refusal of Freedom of Information Act requests, and implemented gag rules that prohibit staffers from talking about a host of environmental issues. Until pressured, he refused to release his meeting calendar–not surprisingly, given what it uncovers( insure No. 5 ).

And once again, there’s the enormous waste of fund. Pruitt has retained his own round-the-clock security detail, costing taxpayers $830,000. No EPA administrator has ever done that. He also installed a secure phone booth in his own office for $33,000, and special locks that expense $6,000.

The reason for all this secrecy is obvious…

5. The EPA Is Now an Industry Puppet

As he did in Oklahoma, Scott Pruitt is taking his orders from the polluters he’s meant to regulate. The New York Times lately tracked who Pruitt met with on a single day, April 26: top executives from a coal-burning utility, the board of a huge coal-mining company, and lobbyists from General Motors. No environmental or public health groups.

The remainder of the six-month period the Times investigated was similar: chemical manufacturers, Shell Oil, truck manufacturers, the National Mining Association, Oklahoma oil lobbyists; not to mention the Koch brothers-funded American Legislative Exchange Council and CropLife America, a trade association run by pesticide manufacturers.

The effects of these close contacts have been obvious. Sometimes, they’ve been plums handed out to specific companies, like the aforementioned Devon Energy, which had agreed to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in penalties for illegally emitting 80 tons of toxic pollution each year–until Pruitt simply voided the settlement and let it go with a slap on the wrist.

More often, the effects are far broader…

4. Regulatory Rollback

Pruitt’s EPA has eradicated regulations that 😛 TAGEND

Verified emissions from a company’s industrial expansion are what the company says they are.( Now the EPA will simply take estimates at face value .)( PDF)

Blocked a potentially disastrous mining operation in Alaska’s Bristol Bay.( The mine will now go forward, though a single leak could devastate the world’s largest sockeye salmon population .)

Required the tracking of methane emissions( this decision was overturned by the Supreme court ).

Required data collection of emissions from oil and gas companies.

Monitored fracking.

Required companies to disclose which hazardous chemicals they’re storing.

Protected tributaries of sensitive bodies of water( even though the EPA’s analysis demonstrated it would expense less to prevent the pollution than to allow it ).( PDF)

Set tighter emissions standards for trucks.

Banned the toxic pesticide chlorpyrifos.

Free Mini-Course and Weekly Updates!

Signup now and receive our Awesome Science Mini-Course and weekly updates when we publish new content.

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.